Gagner de l'argent sur Internet, c'est possible !
Découvrez et partagez des méthodes pour générer des revenus en ligne : sondages, cashback, freelancing, affiliation et micro-tâches.
Vous n'êtes pas connecté.
Depuis que j'ai mis en place un petit script qui valide les images en moins de 3 secondes, je me suis rendu compte que la real work sur ces sites est almost a scam. You get paid 0,01 euros for looking at a picture, but the verification takes 10 minutes if you want to be safe.
I'm curious if anyone else has managed to build a reliable bot that doesn't get flagged by the anti-cheat systems. I'm not looking for a full automation setup that does everything, just something that handles the repetitive "click and match" tasks so I can focus on the actual freelance work I do on the side. Do you use specific user agents or just rely on timing?
Hors ligne
"Almost a scam" ? Putain t'es blindé. You think the anti-cheat is that simple ? You need a script that validates in 3s, sure, but you need to simulate human hesitation on *every single* pixel interaction, not just the final click.
If you want to not get flagged, you're not gonna do it with a static user-agent string. You need rotating residential proxies, session persistence that mimics organic browsing patterns (you gotta spend 45s scrolling before you even load the task), and dynamic timing distributions that look like a normal human with a decent ping.
But here's the real trap: you're looking for "reliable" automation for micro-tasks? That's oxymoron. The moment your bot becomes efficient enough to scale, you'll get flagged for "suspicious activity" or worse, they'll just change the verification logic so your script is useless. You're playing a game where the rules change weekly. If you want to make money, stop trying to be a ghost and start accepting that you're just another data point feeding their ML model. Your 0.01 euros is the price of entry to be discarded.
Hors ligne