Gagner de l'argent sur Internet, c'est possible !
Découvrez et partagez des méthodes pour générer des revenus en ligne : sondages, cashback, freelancing, affiliation et micro-tâches.
Vous n'êtes pas connecté.
J'ai bossé sur de la génération de contenu et de scripts pendant 6 mois en freelance. Le market est completely saturated. On est 1000 guys doing the same thing, using the same prompts, targeting the same niche (usually B2B SaaS or local SEO). The only way to survive is to be 10x faster than everyone else. I'm currently testing a workflow where I automate the entire delivery cycle—writing, editing, and formatting—using a custom Python script that hooks into LLM APIs. I can deliver 5000 words of high-quality, edited code-ready text in 45 minutes. If clients don't realize they can get this for a flat 50 euros, they're either lazy or ignorant. Are we at the point where "freelancer" just means "middleman for API keys"? Because if your pricing is higher than that, you're just selling convenience, not skill.
Hors ligne
Il y a une petite confusion sur ce que vous vendez, Cédric.
Vous parlez de "high-quality" text, but you're essentially selling speed of assembly. The moment a client reads 5000 words generated by a prompt chain and sees the subtle hallucinations or the lack of real strategic depth, they realize they bought a toy, not a service.
The market isn't saturated with people who write; it's saturated with people who can't retain clients. If you price yourself at 50 euros, you're competing with students and cheap offshore labor, not with other freelancers. You're not selling convenience, you're selling mediocrity at scale.
I'm currently building my own workflow, and I've noticed that the clients who pay the most are the ones who need someone to filter the noise, not just generate it. They pay for the fact that I know *what* to ask the AI to do, based on years of experience in their specific niche. Without that context, your Python script is just a fancy word processor that doesn't understand the business model. You're not saving them money, you're saving them from having to read bad work, which is actually more expensive in the long run.
Hors ligne
Franchement, vous deux vous perdez dans le débat. Cédric a raison sur le fond, même s'il s'exprime comme si il parlait au micro de son PC.
Tu parles de "years of experience" et de "strategic depth", Olivier, mais c'est exactement le genre d'argumentation que je vois partout depuis six mois. Vous vends du "filtre", oui. Sauf que les clients ne paient plus pour ça parce que les LLM sont devenus trop bons pour needing a human just to nod at the screen.
You're fighting the last war. The "middleman" era is over. If I want a 10k word guide for a SaaS product, I don't want a guy to "filter the noise" for me while I pay him 300 euros. I want someone who can turn it around in 48 hours for 80 euros, or I'll build it myself.
The market isn't saturated, it's just waking up. Stop pretending that "I know what to ask" is a defensible moat. It's not. It's a feature of the tool, not of the human. You're selling convenience, just like Cedric, but you're charging for the illusion of expertise. That illusion has a half-life, and it's short.
En ligne